The destruction of South Africa,
- for many the crime of the century
|
The destruction of South Africa,
|
|
Het Vlek, the hamlet, which grew to become South Africa, was founded on the shores of Table Bay by Van Riebeek on the 7th April 1652. It was not intended to be anything other than a victualling station for the ships of the Dutch East India Company's en route to the spice islands in the East. No other nation had interest in the region at that time. The people Van Riebeck found there were the Hottentots and Bushmen, Khoisan-speaking peoples. To the Bushmen in particular, southern Africa was their homeland and although their numbers were small, they roamed extensively.
Fruit and vegetable gardens were planted and the hamlet grew. What remains of those gardens today are tree and flower gardens, lawns and pathways, situated at the top of Adderley Street, the main road in central Cape Town. The settlement continued to expand until roughly a hundred and twenty years after Van Riebeeck's landing, when for the first time, substantial contact was made with westerly migrating tribes of black Africans at the eastern boundary of the colony, at the Great Fish river, east of Port Alfred. Thereafter followed 9 interracial wars, spanning 100 years from 1779 onwards.
About a hundred and forty years after Van Riebeek, the French were eying southern Africa and to keep the Cape route to the far East out of French hands, the British invaded the Dutch settlement and, as from the 16th of September 1795, installed their own governors in the forms of Admiral Sir G Elphinstone, Major. General Alured Clarke and JH Craig. The danger averted, the settlement was handed back to the Dutch on the 1st March 1803, only to be taken back by the British on the 10th January 1806 and retained by them until it became a republic outside the British Commonwealth on the 31st of May 1961. Under British rule, much was done to build up the Colony and on the 30th May 1910, the different communities were united into the Union of South Africa and "South Africa" as a nation was born, with 4 provinces, the Cape, Natal, Transvaal and Orange Free State.
Royal visit to safe South Africa, 1947. Turffontein corner, Jo'burg
If South Africa had a troubled history it is nothing compared to that of the world in general. If governments were properly run and their activities confined to the country they were nominally the government of, mankind would be far better off. Unfortunately, the people permitted to govern are incapable of resisting the temptations that almost unrestricted freedom presents to offices of government. As a consequence not only has "government" been turned into a complicated seat for hero worship and amassing money, but its main objective has become interference in, and playing of games of intrigue with other "governments", leading periodically to highly destructive wars. All international wars are started by politicians.
Purporting to put an end to international wars, in 1920 a company of these same politicians formed a "League of Nations". Amongst a number of "mandates" it issued one to South Africa to administer the former German territory known as South West Africa which the SA defence forces had captured in 1915. Failing dismally, at the end of world-war-two in 1945 a fresh alliance with more extensive goals was initiated, called the "United Nations Organisation". It had its headquarters in New York City. In 1996 the UN dictatorially and unilaterally terminated SA's mandate to South West Africa, a move the South African government rejected. Handing the matter over to its International Court of Justice ( the "World Court"); that Court concurred with the UN in 1971, which ruling the SA government also had the courage to reject.
Now you must know that what purports to be a globally dictating body such as the UN could not afford to have its orders flouted, especially by a minor government. The South African government would have to be a lasting example to other unremitting governments. ( the off-purpose mode governments would have to be forced to toe-the-line by any means available.) Trade sanctions, oil and arms embargoes, restricted travel, expulsion from the Universal Postal Union and use of internal agent provocateurs were deployed against South Africa's European government. The UN seized upon apartheid as a scapegoat to bring down South Africa's rulers. Apartheid was no more than a long-established policy means by which Europeans protected their culture and identity.
Living right in the midst of it, it became all too apparent to the SA government that when an advanced culture is integrated with a different, less advanced one, the advanced culture will automatically copy the less advanced, to degenerate thereby. The establishers of South Africa were of the most advanced race group in the world, the Caucasoid, having made the most discoveries and supplied the world with a veritable avalanche of inventions and manufactured goods the world takes for granted. The negro settlers having just emerged from their primitive lifestyles were of the least advanced race group, never having made anything of significance, or even invented a written language of their own, or ships or brick houses, and who were scarcely out of the stone age, making the final outcome from integration all the more pronounced. Clearly, if European culture were to be preserved, especially in Africa, racial integration must not be permitted. Hence the policy of (Afrikaans: separateness).
It was rabbi Abraham L Feinberg of Canada who said "The only way "we" can achieve a final solution to racial prejudice is to create a melange ( a mixture) of races so universal that no one can preen himself on his racial purity or practise the barbarism to safeguard it ... The West must tear the racial poison from its vitals." "Racial prejudice" is not of course the basic problem ( race-group integration is) with the result that rabbi's "solution" is catastrophic! His method would also mean an end to the Jews as a separate entity, unless they are exempted as a special case, as they so often are. There can be no doubt that agent provocateurs who had been sent into communities did their work well. (The only description for this abominable proposal is "racial genocide".)
The net result of this typically destructive idea of "government" practised on such a wide scale was the replacement of European government in South Africa by a black one, in the form of the Communistic ANC and its ragtag beneficiaries. In order to ensure some degree of success, the European Union, another branch of the global-government protagonists ( which has also initiated an African Union and a continental parliament), whose appearance on the European horizon clearly shows up democracy and how easy it is for politicians to twist "the great majority" of citizens around their fingers. For at least six years many millions of euros were donated to equip, fund and train the raw black freedom fighter and train him in the art of European "government" so that the change would not be too glaring to the rest of the world. Various UN member governments chipped in too, with the result that billions poured into ANC coffers. Thus a seemingly impossible change of government was brought about through that killer of real national government, international interference, which is also responsible for the deadly state the world is in today.
Mbeki and Kofi Annan chortle over their victory over stupid whites
Interference, since the beginning of time, has been the essence of trouble between people, groups, governments and nations. Much vaunted and protected democracy, the choosing of governmental candidates on the basis of numbers, couldn't be a clearer indication of the intelligence quota of politicians. Members elected to office should be the best, most learned, most capable, most honest and of the highest integrity. Such people would oppose a system, which uses loyalty to a corrupt, self-serving dynasty as a means of getting elected. Whoever is offered a position as candidate is something of a lottery. To elect a government on such a basis in such a country as South Africa is downright insane. Many blacks are primitive, bush living people of the most backward race group on the planet, to bring them in to the political arena is totally devoid of rationality.
SATV, when it isn't pounding black and white mixing, daily presents pictures of the "poorest of the poor" ( specially organised for the sympathy trip) living in flooded-out areas, no money, no drinking water, no drains or electric lighting, no schools "for our children" and so much in need of your money but, they keep on having children without a shred of responsibility. It is these people who have sent the population graph into a near vertical climb. Leftists keep many Whites in a state of surrender, by constantly telling them they are responsible for the wretched state of poorer blacks. One may ask what would be the position of primitive blacks, if whites had never ventured into Southern Africa? They would of course be in a similar state as they are today. So their condition has absolutely nothing to do with Europeans, particularly when you consider they chose not to become part of White mans society.
What has that fundamental change in South Africa, engineered from afar, produced? To answer that question fairly one has to be thoroughly conversant with conditions in South Africa prior to the change as well as conditions after the change. One needs also to bear in mind that what we call "South Africa" is the product of Europeans and their descendants and that black settlers never produced anything even vaguely approaching it in their history. They are in fact squatters in South Africa. Their heroes are not those who claim to have won freedom from European law for them, but decoys who divert attention from the G-8 leaders who through their fronts secured the current ANC elevation. It is only too obvious that the UN and EU are the real accomplices in the theft of South Africa, Rhodesia, Iraq and so on, and without whose money and influence none of these degrading changes would have happened,
|
Border Technikon students and some of the rubbish they dumped about their campus yesterday A student is someone who studies. Pigs live in squalor. In all my students days, which predated the ANC "freedom". I never once saw a dirty playground or campus |
The main street in Cape Town, once elegant, now a third-world roadway
Change for the worse.
In my youth, before the change, schooling proceeded smoothly year after year. Nowadays, there are constant incidents detracting from the purpose of schooling: trashing of the grounds, stabbing of pupils or teachers, even murders, the closing of schools over some political disagreement, drugs, murderous shootings -- things never dreamed of in my days.
The curriculum had been academic, adequate and free from political contamination. The vagaries of childhood neither needed nor were given "counselling" or treatment with dangerous habit forming psychoactive drugs, the basic cause of the insane school shooting incidents which have arisen today. This insane practice instituted by psychiatrists with stated aims such as: "The idea is to change human nature through redefinition and restructuring of education"; "Education does not mean teaching people to know what they do not know .... it means teaching them to behave as they do not behave", The concept of good and evil is the basis of all neurosis .... the world should be freed from this crippling burden." Does that not run counter to everything that is in the bible .... which is the basis of European civilisation? Other psychiatric mind bending includes "The curriculum be designed to bend the student to the realities of society ... a means of altering culture", and "Through the schools of the world we shall disseminate a new concept of government.
Education which includes teaching the rational difference between what is right and wrong is not part of the current ideology of the day. That schoolchildren cannot read or spell their own names, are already drug addicted in their youth, are sufficiently and artificially mentally disturbed to take guns to school and shoot their associates or become pregnant and have an abortion in their early teens, all of these sudden changes which have resulted from trendy teaching methods, are considered, by our new rulers, a positive advancement over what went before.
South Africa was built out of nothing by Dutch Afrikaners and British settlers. This beautiful modern country once ranked alongside other great civilised, efficient and prosperous nations. Since black majority rule was imposed on the country, principally by way of American and EU finance politics, South Africa has degenerated rapidly in every way.
In my youth there were boy's schools and girl's schools, thus eliminating the sexual distractions which exist today during school hours. There were white and non-white schools, thus eliminating racial strife, cultural difference and a one to fit-all make piece syllabus. Since the introduction of racially-integrated schools, which mix students with differing abilities, pass rates have declined nationally for the past 6 years.
South African cities were once
clean, orderly and safe. Since the change-over neither person nor property is
safe. From a civilised Western establishment South Africa has become the
murder, drug, sexual immorality and lethal-disease capital of the world. This
unbridled lawlessness is common behaviour in the bush, and since the end of
apartheid, it has spread like wildfire throughout Southern Africa. Having seen
how effectively primitive behaviour can destroy civilisation, liberals, Marxists
and World Government people have moved millions of people from the third world
into Europe to do the same there.
AIDS in South Africa is now
wildly out of control with around 1,600 new cases being discovered every day.
According to Archbishop Desmond Tutu, 4 million of his people are infected with
the virus and around 400,000 die from it each year. It was gratifying to here
the Archbishop point out that the most committed workers in the anti-HIV / Aids
camps are white. The Church leader complained to the government that too many
South Africans are living in gruelling, demeaning and dehumanising poverty and
as a result the government is sitting on a powder keg.
The teaching of sex and sexual
aberrations, including homosexuality in schools is fuelling the AIDS epidemic.
Vehicle hi-jackings and house break-ins are so frequent they're no longer
newsworthy. Theft, a common norm in the Bush, is now rampant all over the
city. Road sewer covers and electricity connection covers are missing.
Mountain paths and scenic areas, where as a youth I walked alone, and at all
hours in perfect safety, are today no-go areas even for groups of tourists.
South Africa has no copper mines, but copper exports to China are
booming: the result of a cable theft epidemic which regularly plunges whole
suburbs into darkness, strands thousands of train passengers and is wreaking
havoc with the national economy.
City streets are now often
littered with papers, empty bottles, cartons and the like, a sight once only
seen in Afro shanty towns. Pavements are often littered with sleeping bodies,
smelly from urine and stained with human faeces. So as not to have to come into
direct contact with such people, South Africa once had separate buses for
Europeans. An act heavily critised by World Government people at the time they
sought the overthrow of Western rule. Towns are overcrowded with blacks, often
from outside our borders. They are driven out in one direction by the appalling
conditions found in their own black-governed countries, while being encouraged
to seek refuge in South Africa by a "government" fervent on transforming this
country into an exclusively black State. ( Millions of whites have left South
Africa to chance their fortunes and children's education in other parts of the
former British Empire.) Although the British government has made it clear that
it does not want to take-in many educated, white South Africans, preferring
instead to admit to the UK millions of non-white social outcasts, violent
criminals or those suffering from a serious disease. No sane person would allow
his country to become a squatter camp for the poorly-off from an entire
continent because a small handful of people say so.
Conditions in other parts of
the African continent are so bad that their citizens are only too eager to
immigrate to South Africa which is a relative paradise. This rapid increase in
tribal blacks is rapidly reducing our Western culture and bringing our country
down to third-world level. This is a crime against civilisation which rests
squarely on the shoulders of the UN, EU and the so-called international
community of politicians, whose efforts alone have made possible this
degradation. What's more, it is being enforced across Europe and the former
British Empire as well.
How do you weaken something, a
glass of whisky, for instance, which is too strong for you? You dilute it. It
works nationally and racially too. What kind of mentalities would advocate the
dilution of a nation or a racial group? Mentalities which are mentally
disturbed and are unable to adjudicate rationally on matters of right and
wrong. We see the glaringingly evident results of such racial dilution in the
renamed Rhodesia ( now Zimbabwe) and increasingly in the larger South Africa.
We see a spate of place renaming which is one step in national theft. When such
things are not only condoned but enforced by international dictatorships there
is little future left for the future of mankind. When a tribe, a race or nation
cannot rely on the integrity of those expected to lead, it is on the road to
extinction. So are those "leaders".
Despite all the years and money
spent by the EU training the Negro to govern a European economy, we find now
that the use to which he puts the training is theft, called "transformation".
While the country falls to pieces through lack of government his whole intent is
total control and ownership of a Western-style country, he is incapable of
building unaided. Black leaders, like Robert Mugabe cannot conceive the idea of
ruling on behalf of the entire nation. They behave as though they have won a
country like a prize in a raffle, and it is their property to do with as they
wish. One can't really blame him but one can certainly blame those Europeans
who are little more than traitors to their own racial group and whose irrational
sentiments and actions are insanely destroying European culture. They have
proven beyond doubt their unfitness to lead.
Nelson Mandela's ANC's first
triumph after marching into the South African Houses of Parliament ( which must
have seemed like a palace after their huts in the bush) was on Wednesday 24th of
January 1996, at the University of the Western Cape's "Mayibuye Centre". There
he had removed the portraits of the European former members from the walls to
be banished to an unknown fate, and replacing them with a UN anti-apartheid
exhibition. Other changes were the national flag, the anthem, the mace, the
coat of arms, the motto ( with the chant " OUR constitution, OUR Parliament, OUR
people, Our South Africa). A long list of street and place name changes took
place, as well as slicing up the provinces --- all part of the calculated theft
of South Africa, whilst instead of condemning it the UN and EU looked on and
applauded.
“The Portal To Natal” is the famous railway line which is used to transport grain
from Johannesburg to Natal. Reeling under the relentless thievery of blacks who
will steal, break and plunder every imaginable thing under the sun, this railway
line is under major threat. As a consequence, this holds serious repercussions
for regional agriculture
Stolen Manhole Covers