Marxist will exploit any issue for their own purpose

Quite often, a group of people, concerned about some injustice will organize a peaceful demonstration. The subject may be GM crops, safety of children at school, closure of a hospital, or the proposed building of an airport.   Recognising that the protest will likely gain public support,  Marxists and Trotskyites latch on to the activity as if it were their own.  Suddenly, groups of people will appear offering their support.  The event organisers are pleased to see their numbers swelling, caring not who these strangers may be.  

Whenever event organisers hold a public demonstration, members of extreme left-wing organisations will set up stalls and begin selling various kinds of communist material which is generally anti-British, anti-white, anti-Christian and anti-civilisation.  The front headline on their newspapers could well be about the theme of the demonstration, thus giving the impression to onlookers that it is a Socialist Workers or Communist Party event.  Numerous red communist flags will be in evidence whenever the protestors gather in public. This reinforces the notion that it is a communist-organised affair. The overall effect is that the demonstration has been hijacked, and the decent people who initiated the protest have  unintentionally lent credibility to extreme left-wing subversives, whose intent is to destroy our national identity, as well as our Christian-based culture, civilisation and way of life. 

According to the revolutionary left "Palestine is a British working class issue!"  Many communist organisations have been quick to muscle-in on the Palestinian Displacement question. Here a strange mixture of Communists, liberals, homosexuals and Muslims took to the streets, intent on gaining a fair deal for Palestinians.  Although Communists may claim so, we doubt whether this is an issue which crosses many Britons' minds in the course of a week.  No doubt, Muslims and Communists are using each other for their own promotional aims. The Reds are being used to raise the issue of the Middle East crisis, while Communists are happy to receive publicity which depicts them as concerned and caring.  Although they don't have much in common, they seem in this regard to co-operate reasonably well.

London pro-Palestine demonstration. Included on the march were Muslims, Communists and homosexuals  

Muslims hold strict views on matters such as drug-taking, alcohol abuse, homosexuality, harsh sentencing of serious criminals, and a rigid set of religious principles - everything in fact that Communists oppose.  So why do the two groups wish to maintain an alliance?  If Muslims had their way, Communism would be eradicated forever.  If left-wing cranks had bothered to search the Koran or paid attention to Muslim ideology they would have realized that Communism is against all religions.  Are Muslims unaware of this? Perhaps they merely use the communist army, with its many white faces, to give the impression that Muslims have been accepted.

Left-wing crank George Galloway has stated "I glorify Hezbollah and its leader, Nasrallah."  This man strongly supports Muslims in their battle to retain their political, religious and cultural credo, which includes "death to homosexuals".  When it comes to our own youth, George Galloway, promotes the sick " Gay Pride" events where thousands of lost souls, many on drugs, display to the world

their desperate and depressing lifestyles.  Galloway, like many other Communists, will support Muslim extremists, the promotion of homosexuality among whites, and any other kind of activity which is damaging to the British nation. Feminism, Human Rights, liberalism, political-correctness, immigration, multi-culturalism, degenerate art, mind-numbing entertainment, opposition to school sports, acceptance of drugs, low-level education - all of these have been used by anti-racists in an attempt to turn many of our young into something akin to third-world losers.  

In the summer of 2007, around twenty thousand Muslims and Communists held a pro- Palestinian march in central London.  As they passed around a bend in the road they were met by around fifty Zionists, holding a pathetic looking counter demonstration.  As the marchers passed them by, they slowed, sometimes stopping to spit venom and hurl abuse at the small Zionist contingent.  What must that small band of plucky counter-demonstrators have been thinking? Here were the twin monsters of Communism and Marxism, both Zionist creations, being wielded against them. No one has done more to entice Muslims into Britain than extremists from the Zionist political community. Many Muslims hate their Zionist cousins to the point where the Iranian leader has claimed he wants to see Israel "wiped off the map".  No doubt sooner or later, Jewish communities in the UK will become revenge targets for atrocities committed by the American and British governments.  So why are Zionist leaders so keen to swamp Britain with Muslims?  We put this question to a veteran anarchist who was watching the Pro-Palestine demonstration.

This is his reply : " Muslims have been brought to Britain by connivance of Zionist-led groups that cannot be denied. Those behind this so-called immigration programme live in ivory towers, in safe areas.  Jews who reside in towns and run the risk of being killed in terrorist attacks, are viewed as expendable by Zionists who are plotting the Islamification of Britain. Muslims are being given every opportunity to inflict damage on the British nation, for the benefit of Zionist extremists.

However, the global Muslim threat does not unduly bother the world controllers, for it could be rapidly terminated at any time by using American and British armed forces to bomb  Arab States into submission.  It is a case off a small band of Zionists attracting Muslims to Britain, and then inciting them to attack.  Those doing the scheming live in safe areas.   Those doing the scheming live in safe areas, leaving the ordinary Jews to bear the brunt of any attack. If you take a careful look at those creating problems around the world who purport to being Jews, you will generally find they are not Semites, do not follow any religion or have any moral values, so to all intents and purposes they are not Jews at all." Here we have an anarchist giving his views which have been formulated over a lifetime. The surprising thing is that they are not that much different from our own. ( We would point out that anarchists are not necessarily left-wing.) 

There are certain words favoured by Marxists which give away their involvement in any organisation.  Those concerned with ill-treatment of animals set up an organisation with a logical title saying they were "Against Cruelty to Animals".  When Marxists took over it became "Animal Rights".  It is clear that Marxists are behind the uprising in Burma. The demonstrators are calling for "democracy".  This is not a word that would come into the minds of those seeking justice from despotic rulers. The media has led the public to believe that monks were among the first to challenge the military authority.  This is not the case.  Students who have been brainwashed with ideas of Marxist revolution, were the first to create civil unrest.  The military was provoked into overreacting as can often happen, which has given the United States government an excuse to intervene.  Once again, we see left-wing Marxists working in conjunction with the American government, in what appears to be another attempt to enlarge the Money-Power Empire.  Similar strategy was employed in Germany and Britain in the 1930s, and in Iraq when Saddam Hussein was in control. An unexpected admission of duplicity has come to light. It seems a small contingent of Zionist Jews living in Burma have been taking their religious services with the monks who demonstrated against the government.

Every European country allows experienced Marxist indoctrinators to work in their schools, colleges and universities. Communism and Marxism although now totally discredited have come to occupy more and more of the classroom syllabus.  These poisonous doctrines are written into most lessons; social science, multiculturalism, sex education, literature and history in particular.  A good number of students become street active communists-agitators. They can be seen in their thousands ranting and screaming at demonstrations throughout the West. Most of them leave university, find a job, get married and forget all about Communism. There are others however, who find they can make a lucrative career with their Marxist philosophy, working as journalists, politicians, writers, lecturers and historians.  Marxists are to be found in large numbers within television and film industries from the Managing Director down. 

SLIPPING COMFORTABLY FROM STUDENT-MARXISTS TO SENIOR MAINSTREAM POLITICIANS

An incredible number of student Marxist-revolutionaries have gone on to become political leaders. Pol Pot, Denis Healey, Tony Blair, Michael Foot, Daniel Cohn Bendit ( Danny the Red),  Neil Kinnock, Aung San Suu Kyi, Jack Straw, Peter Mandelson and Charles Clarke are names that immediately spring to mind. Tony Blair belonged to the Anti Nazi League, a communist organisation which was set up with the intention of  preventing the British from reclaiming control of their country from bankers and Marxists. While demonstrating, like a lunatic with the Anti Nazi League in Oxford, Tony Blair had to be forcibly restrained by a group of police officers. Looking at the leaders of New Labour, should one really be surprised that they are anti-British in everything they do?  

Charles Clarke one of many talent-less ex Marxists who went on to hold a cabinet position.

It is clear that Gordon Brown is a Marxist. That he works closely with the world's financial institutions does not prevent him from being a Marxist. In fact the two are inseparable for they both have the same objectives and work in tandem to achieve them. The British currently face many serious problems, an increasing number of street-stabbings, drug dependency, an escalation of crime, the appalling state of our hospitals, and uncontrolled immigration. The rising cost of living and widespread personal debt has resulted in a rapid increase in bankruptcies and repossessions.  At a time when we need positive action to solve these problems, what does Gordon Brown's government make top priority?  Introducing a seven-year jail sentence for anyone making derogatory comments about homosexuals. This act has not been introduced for the benefit of the public. It merely further curtails freedom of expression, and makes the individual more subservient to the Marxist state. Gordon Brown's second act was to sign Britain up to the EURO constitution. This is not in the interest of the British nation either.

Champion of the people Jean-Marie Le Pen

Jaques Chirac, elected by an unholy alliance.

Defeated: Prime Minister Lionel Jospin

French National Front leader, Jean-Marie Le Pen beat France's Prime Minister Lionel Jospin at the country's presidential election held in April 2002.  Immediately Communists, liberals and neo Conservatives dropped their pretence of having differences, and united to prevent Le Pen, the man of the people, from being elected in the final round, when he had to go head to head with Jaques Chirac.  Here we see once again Communists working to get an inner-circle, financial establishment man elected.

There is a saying "You don't get the government you want, you get the one you deserve." Let us make sure we vote out of office all Marxists and World Bank devotees at the next general election. 

Successive governments since 1939,and possibly even earlier, have implemented the Communist Party manifesto. This has been made possible by Parliament's subservience to powerful American financial institutions. The aim of these Communist-Capitalists is to break down nations, reduce the standard of living for everyone to Third-World level and to destroy all nations that are moral, successful and influential. White Western nations have been the prime target for Communists, although exceptional nations like the Tibetans have been singled out for eradication, so too the South American Indian tribes. The aim behind this monstrous activity is to bring about a World Government controlled through the abuse of money. Christians and Muslims will recognise this as the rise of Mammon over Christianity. Muslims refer to the American based money power as the Great Satan.

The worlds media, controlled by a few wealthy individuals, usually restrict themselves to a Marxist view of world events.  It was refreshing to see, on 12th October 2007, an article in the Metro newspaper headed "BBC stoked Burma riots claims junta. BURMA'S military rulers have accused the BBC of provoking the anti-government demonstrations in the country. The junta said the corporation and 'other big powers' which were behind the recent pro-democracy protests, which had to be put down."  Burma's rulers also accused foreign governments and broadcaster including Radio Free Asia and Voice of America of agitating civil unrest in the country. An unexpected admission of duplicity has come to light.  It seems that a contingent of Zionist Jews living in Burma, had made themselves unpopular, and as a result have been keeping a low profile, taking their religious services with the monks who demonstrated against the government. 

In getting involved in actions such as stirring hatred in Burma, Marxists are helping Gordon Brown, by diverting attention away from the enormous problems we have in the UK. Emotive language is being used to stir up hatred against the Burmese government. No doubt the military junta has been responsible for some inhuman killings, we cannot think of any government that hasn't.   However, it is safe to assume that the New Labour Government, has been responsible for the deaths of more innocents than the Burmese junta. If you add up the deaths of civilians and combatants in Iraq, Afghanistan and the Balkans, to those who died needlessly in British hospitals, plus youngsters who have died from drug-abuse and the elderly who have fallen victim to Government callousness, the number would be staggering.

Aun San Suu Kyi the leader of the (misnamed) Burmese pro democracy movement is the darling of the world-government media. The picture they paint is of a 62 year-old calmly seeking a better life for the Burmese. This is not true.  She is yet another trouble-making Oxford-trained, Marxist-revolutionary, intent on causing sufficient trouble with the military government, to precipitate American troops being sent there. Already groups of Communists have taken to the streets in London, Newcastle and Brighton asking the "International Community" to step up pressure on Burma's military government. The words " International Community" would conjure up millions of people from many countries collectively voicing an opinion. In reality this so-called International Community comprises no more than George Bush and his war-hawks, a couple of high-ranking officials from the World Bank, some arms manufacturers and if their lucky our Prime Minister and a couple of billionaires or bankers from the City of London.  

Pim Fortuyn Dutch right wing anti-immigration  leader. Assassinated in 2002 He was Noted for warning against spread of Islam in Europe.

In the spring of 1982, the Dutch right wing anti-immigration party had gained enormous support just before the countries elections. Their charismatic leader Pim Fortuyn was hated by Communists and establishment politicians alike.  He was shot dead by left-wing animal rights activist, Volkart Van der Graaf.  The killer remained strangely calm as he was questioned by police for 24 hours.  Yet another case of a leftist helping the ruling financial establishment to retain control. 

 

Volkart Van der Graaf, left wing activist,  murdered anti immigration campaigner Pim Fortuyn

On September 29th 2007, the extreme left-wing, Daily Mirror had a title which read, "She ( Aun San Suu Kyi) Has Been the Inspiration for the Pro Democracy Protests that Have Rattled Burma's Brutal Dictators and Gripped the World."  Here we have shades of the Saddam Hussein hysteria story, where it was claimed he had weapons of mass destruction, which could reach Britain in forty five minutes. On October 1st it was reported that Aun San Suu Kyi met with an envoy from that sinister World Government organisation, the UN.  We are witnessing in Burma now, the same nation-wrecking sequence of events that has taken place in country after country. White House interference, has time after time, left nations starving, disease-ridden, divided, corrupted and burdened with debt.  As a result of global detestation for the United States government, Americans travelling abroad have been advised to keep the level of their voices down, and pretend to be Canadian.  One black Ugandan wrote in a political newspaper " For as long as America interferes in the internal affairs of every country, we should all have a vote in their elections."  The United States and British governments are always harping on about democracy, which they seem to believe is making everyone subservient to them.  Our idea of democracy is for every nation to be free to set an agenda which best suits its own people.

 The Burma Saga carries on along Predictable lines. 

Left wing scribbler Sarah Kaiser wrote in the Jewish news on the 8th November 2007 that "The images of Burmese military violently supressing peaceful protests were truly shocking and led to worldwide action." The military government she says, in an emotive way, suppresses almost all dissent and wields absolute power." Doesn't every government? There is not much place for dissent in New Labour's Britain where people are arrested, by gangs of police, for doing no more than calling out a list of soldiers killed in Iraq. 

Ms Kaiser claims it was money trouble that finally pushed the Burmese people onto the streets when the price of fuel doubled. Couldn't we lay similar charges against Gordon Brown?  What began with a small demonstration grew to hundreds of thousands.   No doubt most of the protestors were sheparded there by Socialist and Communist party workers.  How does one bring order to an area when hundreds of thousands of rioters are intent on causing damage and creating anarchy?  The British police lost control in Toxteth when only a few hundred Asians went on the rampage and finished by setting fire to cars and buildings. The French police suffered the same dilemma when thousands of non-white immigrants, urged on by Communists, rioted for eighteen nights. They attacked over 300 towns, burnt down public buildings and schools and set around 8,500 cars on fire.             

The columnist then made the most astonishing statement, saying that the demonstrators in Burma needed to carry on because they hadn't realised the aims of their protest - lower commodity prices, national reconciliation and immediate release of political prisoners.  We could justifiably, at times, make the same demands of our government without a hope in hells chance of it happening.  How many Britons would have to take to the streets to force Gordon Brown to get the hospital wards cleaned properly, tear up the EU constitution, bring our troops home from Iraq and Afghanistan or terminate the growing of GM food?  Why should anyone want to impose our sham democracy on to others?

Banazir Bhutto was killed in an explosion while parading at an election rally. An Oxford trained Marxist, she was a darling of the western establishment. Fed up with corruption of their government and its continual willingness to bend to demands made by the United States, many thousands of Pakistanis have fled to Britain. It was encouragement from the White House which led Banazir Bhutto to return and put herself up for election. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benazir_Bhutto Banazir's son is currently studying at Oxford University.  The last thing Pakistan needs is another Marxist revolutionary pretending to be for the people, while selling out to billionaire power-brokers in America.

 

The violent nature of Marxists does not make them good allies

When the twenty thousand Muslims and Communists turned the corner on the way to the pro-Palestine rally at Trafalgar Square, they met a Zionist counter demonstration which consisted of a mere twenty six individuals.  Watching from the sidelines it looked as though there could of been a massacre.

Up until recently Zionists have been able to count on communists for support.  The former have always viewed nationalists as their only rivals.  Because of their Christian nature right-wing groups do not resort to violence.  Their new left-wing enemy poses a much greater threat  because they are not bound by any such moral code.  Left-wing revolutionaries are taught, while students,  that it doesn't matter how savage and inhuman the attack; "the end justifies the means."