|
Once Proud Britons now show signs of living under occupation
|
|
The English National Ballet's leading ballerina, Simone Clarke, was demoted and pushed into resigning because she is pro-English. Such is the serious and ludicrous position that, through fear and apathy the British have landed themselves in. However, the Marxists and Zionists who hounded Miss Clarke into this position will be chalking up another victory. No doubt they have an African or Asian ballerina already lined up to take the lead in future "English" National Ballet productions. The aim of left-wing movements is to wipe out the white British nation, while humiliating it in the process. Isn't it time we fought back?
Can you imagine a Muslim dancer being sacked in the same way? Of course not, not even if she supported one her own nation's extremist organisations that advocate the use of violence in Britain, which at least ten per cent of them do. If such action were taken against one of their own, thousands of Muslims would bear down on the London Coliseum management, the race relations industry would be seeking prosecution and the newspapers would be demanding her reinstatement and humiliating those responsible for her removal.
What allows this kind of thing to happen is the Englishman's warped and misplaced sense of fair play, which has become an excuse for appeasement and surrender. Simone Clarke is the best ballerina that the English National Ballet has and she should get the leading roles. Do you really think that the arrival of Muslims, Hindus and Sikhs in our country should put the British in the position of becoming apologetic and downtrodden misfits without the right of an opinion or opportunity to defend themselves? Those behind Miss Clarke's removal are not from the coloured immigrant communities anyway. They are Marxists, probably British, who have been trained to hate their own kind by Zionists.
The trouble for Simone Clarke began when a collection of such Marxists and Zionists, while attending one of her performances, in Giselle,at the London Coliseum, began shouting and demonstrating because she was a member of the British National Party. An indignant audience, annoyed by the rudeness of the uneducated ruffians, would have been happy to see the management throw them out. But, undeterred the left-wing thugs were allowed to continue with their harassment over a period of around a year.
Miss Clarke has a half-caste child fathered by Yen-Sen Chang, a fellow dancer from the English National Ballet. Yen-Sen is a Cuban immigrant of Chinese descent. Since the birth of the child he has abandoned her. From her unfortunate choice of partner it is clear that Simone is not "racist". The ballerina simply had an unsuitable relationship with a non-white because too few of her parents' generation took the trouble to counter the nation-wrecking and genocidal propaganda which was being widely broadcast.
Simone Clarke and her new boyfriend, BNP Councillor Richard Barnbrook, seem resigned to the dancer's appalling treatment, leaving them both with time to concentrate on low-level council politics. Richard Barnbrook, using a watered down version of the original BNP policy, said "I'm not opposed to mixed marriages, but their children are washing out the identity of this country's indigenous people." ( In that case he should oppose the idea of mixed marriages.) Worse, he later retracted the statement and claimed his comments were taken out of context. What a gutless wimp! If only we had all those brave men here today who bravely went off to war in 1939. ( Unfortunately, they went off to fight purely for the benefit of the same kind of Marxists and Zionists who have had Simone Clarke removed from her cherished position as lead ballerina.) That's gratitude for you.
|
|
Richard Barnbrook (from BNP) will not help win us our country back by collapsing into bleatings of surrender whenever he comes up against the enemy. |
OUR BACKS ARE AGAINST THE WALL- WE CANNOT RETREAT ANY FURTHER
Afraid to say how they feel, or report what they see, many Britons cower in fear at their new masters. The British are no longer represented at any level. The occupying invisible army is in league with the Labour and Conservative Parties who readily carry out their anti-British demands.
It has now reached the stage where many Britons, under pressure, have abandoned their right to protect and perpetuate their once-great nation. Most of the pressure placed on Britons ( and other Europeans) to commit racial genocide is coming from political Zionist movements. These do not speak for the general Jewish community. In fact they do not speak at all. Their method of dominance comes almost unseen via abuse of money, and the enormous power they have accumulated through their new breed of "internationalist" (anti-nationalist) global politics.
WE DO NOT LIVE UNDER NORMAL CIRCUMSTANCES
Let us look at a more confident and rational attitude to group identity as displayed by the Jewish community. On the 21st December under the heading " Comment and analysis ", Jonathon Romain wrote in The Jewish Chronicle of the problems of intermarriage within the Jewish community.
For one belonging to that specific group Mr Romain takes a particularly lenient view of Jews marrying out, yet his writing is littered with thoughts of horror at the prospect of dwindling numbers.
His essay begins "Twenty years ago, a religious bombshell exploded in North West London. Its immediate impact was felt widely at the time, but two decades later, its long-term significance has still not been grasped fully." This was in relation to a high percentage of Jews who were marrying out of the faith.
Jonathon Romain organised a meeting under the heading "I'm Jewish, My Partner Isn't" with the aim of keeping all within the Jewish community. This meeting drew much criticism from "Jewish clergy and laity who felt that no such acknowledgement should be given to the problem, either because they denied that intermarriage was even an issue for British Jewry, or because they admitted its existence but wanted completely to ostracise anyone who dared transgress in any way."
For his efforts in welcoming non-Jews into the community Mr Romain was vilified in the letters pages of the Jewish Chronicle and sent hate mail accusing him of "giving the green light to assimilation" and "doing Hitler's work for him." By his own admission, most Jewish leaders would rather see "outreach attempts" used to "rescue Jews from the clutches of non-Jews and preventing them getting to the stage of intermarriage ( which is then regarded as being over the abyss and too late for any help)." Clearly the Jewish community understands that assimilation means disappearance and they are not frightened to say so.
Unlike British Christians, Jews have no fear or reservation in taking action to preserve their identity, although it is admittedly becoming more difficult in a "multi-racial society". ( A multi-racial society, we might add, that has been imposed on the British by an alien force, against the wishes of the majority.) However, the Jewish community can remain confident for it is not being constantly hounded and threatened by a red army of race-hate inquisitors. That in their own land Britons are unique in the genocide stakes is summed up in a Parliamentary declaration that "only whites can be racists."